Copy
View this email in your browser

Focus on carbon leakage in the EU, the use of public funds to support adaptation and asset cost recovery under environmental regulations 


Welcome to the Spring edition of our newsletter with updates on some of our work here at Vivid Economics.

We have been engaged in wide-ranging policy and strategic analysis for UK and global clients over recent months. With EU leaders set to agree the bloc’s 2030 climate and energy goals later in the year, we performed detailed modelling of the extent of possible carbon leakage scenarios under a range of future carbon prices for a major European government. We evaluated the current criteria used by the Commission in determining whether a sector is at risk of leakage and compared these against available alternatives. In addition, we reviewed the effectiveness of the different policy options available for combating leakage.

In the UK, the Department for International Development (DFID) asked us to consider what the appropriate role for international public funds to support adaptation in developing countries might be. Taking an explicitly economic perspective, we reviewed the current state of knowledge on the costs of adaptation in developing countries and the approaches that can be taken to prioritise adaptation actions. We also examined the appropriate role of the public sector in supporting these activities and developed a framework for determining the geographic priorities for different types of adaptation spending. Our work also included a high-level briefing to senior officials prior to COP-19. You can read our key findings here.

Some of our major private work focussed on cost recovery under a variety of international environmental regulations for a major energy multinational. We developed a comprehensive framework for assessing commercial risk for specific assets and asset classes stemming from environmental regulation. The framework allows for the estimating of how the impact of each regulation on asset profitability varies with the strength of the regulation as well as the ordering of regulations by their relative impact on asset profitability.

Below you will find some of our other international work. For more details on these, or for information on our many other projects not mentioned here, please feel free to email us.

Twitter
Facebook
Website
Analysing Australian energy supply and economy-wide emissions intensity. The Australian Climate Change Authority (CCA) commissioned us to analyse the drivers behind changes in Australian electricity demand, the emissions intensity of energy supply and the economy-wide emissions intensity. We examined the contribution of economic growth, efficiency gains, economic restructuring and the effects of fuel switching and renewable deployment on each. We found that of the 6.3 per cent improvement in electricity generation emissions intensity after 2008, four fifths was due to a rising share of gas and renewables in generation output. Our results on the drivers in emissions trends were used by the CCA in its February report, “Reducing Australia’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Targets and Progress Review”, and our work can be found here.
Devising a results-based M&E framework in Uganda. We participated in a consortium that German Development Bank KfW tasked with devising a results-based monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework for the GET FiT programme in Uganda. The programme provides a feed-in tariff premium for selected projects in Uganda. It also facilitates off-taker and political risk guarantees from the World Bank and liaises with financial institutions to enhance the availability of private sector financing. Our key responsibilities were reviewing international best practice on M&E and recommending a methodology for devising an adjusted baseline against which project outcomes could be assessed.
Tweet
Share
Forward
Copyright © 2014 Vivid Economics, All rights reserved.


Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp