Copy

We are glad to introduce the new IASC event!
The aim of the workshop is to bring together scholars working with either propositional analysis of visual argumentation or other, innnovative tools that allow for the reconstruction of argumentative content of images, diagrams, films, etc. Our aim is to share strategies and difficulties of how normative analyses can tackle institututional constraints in which visual communication is embedded, as in the case of advertisements, medical, or scientific discourse. We encourage submissions connected to:
 
  • Methods of reconstructing visual arguments.
  • Interpreting words and images.
  • Verbal and visual rethoric.
  • Dialelectic and pragmatic aspects of visual arguments.
  • Jargon specific features of visual argumentation (arts, posters, cartoons, films, advertisements... etc.)
  • Validity of visual argumentation.

Download the rationale of the workshop
 
Rodica Amel, IASC honorary member, wrote a beautiful report of the last Conference in Tel Aviv. We are pleased to share her thoughts with the IASC community.

CONTROVERSIES AND BEYOND
Rodica Amel
 
 
A synthesis summarizing the scientific activity of the International Association for the Study of Controversy renders evident the conclusion that the importance of IASC research is greater than it seems at first sight. We are actually confronted with a new philosophical approach of the human condition,  from the perspective of the inter-human reality – our daily reality of conflicts and controversies.
The members of the IASC group develop prof. Marcelo Dascal’s work dedicated to the philosophy of controversy. Prof. M. Dascal is the founder of IASC, which is like a “school” of researchers trained in the pragmatic aspects of language. The Association  has international extension and is part of the International Society of Philosophy (FISP). Conscious of the scientific dignity of belonging to FISP – quality obtained  by prof. M.Dascal, the president of the Association,  the Vice President, Giovanni Scarafile, and Leah Gruenpeter Gold, the member of the organizing board, carry on the spirit of the mentor, with much endeavor, openness and devotion.  One of their tasks is to organize the ceremonial of annual meetings of the Association, mission that requires great effort and intelligence in finding institutional support everywhere the conferences take place and in finding new subjects of debate that could open a modern regard on social, ideological or philosophical divergences.
Beyond conflicts of any kind (non-verbal and verbal), that constitute the object of research, there is a “dialogical complicity” between the IASC members, which dominate de cyclical gatherings. The creativity of each participant is stimulated in the direction of avoiding scientific stereotypes and methodological clichés. Due to a humanistic ideal, which was explicitly stipulated from the beginning of the Association, the importance of the philosophical target is much increased. The epistemological rationality should clarify and assume the basic concepts of  humanism, in order to  frame  the conflicts in a “normative” system of reference. The ethical orientation of the research is transferred to the  researchers themselves and has become a “categorical imperative” of their behavior. All members of the IASC – says the Vice President in his conclusive words – “are called to an intellectual militancy, not limited to the books we write, but also to provide answers to the problems with which our contemporaries are struggling”.

[Continue]


 
Science and Democracy
2016 IASC International Conference, in PISA, is arriving!


Read the rationale of the Conference
Copyright © IASC 2016 All rights reserved.


Our mailing address is:
Giovanni Scarafile
Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici
Università del Salento
Palazzo Parlangeli - Studio 26A
Via V.M. Stampacchia, 45
73100 LECCE - ITALY


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list